Legal Opinion

Fowles v. Rupert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1904No. Docket No. 32PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Assumpsit by Louis Fowles against Conrad Rupert for breach of a contract to purchase certain hay. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

This case was commenced in justice’s court. The plaintiff filed with the justice a written con-tract, reading as follows:

“ C. Rupert & Sons of Newark, N. Y., bought fromL. Fowles all the hay in stacks on his farm except two stacks which had rain on it after it was cut and before it was stacked for four dollars and fifty cents a ton. Fowles is to cut or rake from stacks all the outside and stained hay not fit for market. Fowles is to help bale and deliver and load on cars at Renton without charge and board men and team and find fuel for engine while baling. Hay to be baled first September or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rayburn v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hudson v. FeigeMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fowles v. RupertMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API