Lee v. Briggs
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clare. (Hart, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The; facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiffs entered into a contract with defend*488ants to lumber for them certain lands on sections 13, 24, and 25, in township 21 N., of range 2 W., and section 5, in township 21 N., of range 1 W., and were to finish a portion the first season and a certain portion the following season; but nothing in the contract prevented them from performing all the contract during the second season that had not been performed the first. The plaintiffs were in default, in the spring of 1891, as to the amount of timber they were to put in the first season under the contract, and defendants claimed damages for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen v. McKibbinMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Leonard v. BeaudryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Rayburn v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herron v. RauppMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Cole v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Barker & Stewart Lumber Co. v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1905
- Nurmi v. BeardsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1938