Legal Opinion
Cansino v. Bank of America
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 2014No. H038713PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GROVER, J.
Plaintiffs Carlos and Resurreccion Cansino appeal from a judgment of dismissal sustaining defendant’s demurrer to a second amended complaint without leave to amend. Because plaintiffs’ complaint fails for lack of specificity, and because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend the complaint, we will affirm the trial court’s judgment.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In 2000, plaintiffs obtained a $280,000 mortgage loan from National City Mortgage Company doing business as Accubanc Mortgage. The record does not reveal whether the loan was for the purchase or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Sierra Palms Homeowners Ass'n v. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Constr. Auth., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Brown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Public Employees' Retirement System v. Moody's Investors Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Avila v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Flextronics International USA, Inc. v. Sparkling Drink Systems Innovation Center Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.