Legal Opinion
Lazar v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1996No. S044234PublishedCited by 527 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
We granted review in this matter to clarify, following our decisions in Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 654 [254 *635Cal.Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373] (Foley) and Hunter v. Up-Right, Inc. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1174 [26 Cal.Rptr.2d 8, 864 P.2d 88] (Hunter), whether or under what circumstances a plaintiff may state a cause of action for fraudulent inducement of employment contract. The Court of Appeal concluded the allegations of the plaintiff in this case are adequate to state such a cause of action. For the reasons that follow, we agree. Accordingly, we affirm the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by527 opinions
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
522 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.