Legal Opinion

Schifando v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2003No. S106660PublishedCited by 350 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted review to determine whether a city employee must exhaust both the administrative remedy that the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code,1 § 12900 et seq.) (FEHA) provides and the *1080internal remedy that a city charter requires before filing an FEHA disability discrimination claim in superior court. We conclude the employee need not exhaust both administrative remedies, and that receiving a Department of Fair Employment and Housing (the Department) “right to sue” letter is a sufficient prerequisite to filing an FEHA claim in superior court.

I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by350 opinions

  1. City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
  3. McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API