Schifando v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
We granted review to determine whether a city employee must exhaust both the administrative remedy that the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code,1 § 12900 et seq.) (FEHA) provides and the *1080internal remedy that a city charter requires before filing an FEHA disability discrimination claim in superior court. We conclude the employee need not exhaust both administrative remedies, and that receiving a Department of Fair Employment and Housing (the Department) “right to sue” letter is a sufficient prerequisite to filing an FEHA claim in superior court.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by350 opinions
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.