Legal Opinion

Roberts v. SAIF Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2006No. 02-07221; CA A122465; SC S52078PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*50KISTLER, J.

A coworker backed a company pickup into claimant while claimant was riding a motorcycle at work. Claimant filed a workers’ compensation claim. Employer resisted the claim on the ground that a statutory exclusion for injuries incurred “while engaging in or performing *** any recreational or social activity] primarily for the worker’s personal pleasure” applied. See ORS 656.005(7)(b)(B) (stating exclusion).1 The Workers’ Compensation Board held that the exclusion applied, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Roberts v. SAIF, 196 Or App 414, 102 P3d 752 (2004). We allowed claimant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. McBroom v. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Roberts v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Ware v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Legacy Health Systems & Legacy Health System v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. Rodriguez-BarreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API