Legal Opinion

Ware v. Hall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2007No. CV050218; CA A127954; SC S53337PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

In this post-conviction case, the trial court entered judgment dismissing the post-conviction petition with prejudice the same day that the petition was filed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment without opinion. Ware v. Hall, 204 Or App 457, 130 P3d 808 (2006). Because we conclude that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition with prejudice, we reverse the Court of Appeals decision and the trial court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings.

We take the facts from the allegations in the post-conviction petition. In 2002, a jury convicted petitioner of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bobo v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Roberts v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Farmer v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Dillard v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API