State v. Rodriguez-Barrera
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for, among other things, delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school. ORS 457.904. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal on that charge. According to defendant, the state failed to prove that he had intended drug activity to take place within 1,000 feet of a school. The state argues that the statutes that define the offense require no such proof. We agree with the state and affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant was driving through Silverton when police…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Leonard Lloyd (92-2106) Shawn Huffman (92-2108) Darryl Little (92-2146) and Mario Taylor (92-2175)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Alcutt v. Adams Family Food Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.