State v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*26LANDAU, J.
At issue in this case is the meaning of ORS 809.235(l)(b) (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, ch 436, § l,1 which provides that a court must order a person’s driving privileges revoked either if the person is convicted of felony driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) or “if the person is convicted of misdemeanor driving while under the influence of intoxicants under ORS 813.010 for a third time.” (Emphasis added.) In this case, defendant pleaded guilty to misdemeanor DUII. It happens to be his fourth misdemeanor DUII. The question is whether ORS 809.235(l)(b) requires…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StonemanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Oregon Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. BranamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. RichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Filipetti v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.