Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1996No. WCB 93-08329, 93-05174; CA A85441; SC S42504PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, employer instructed claimant to avoid heavy lifting on the job. Claimant was injured when he fell (or slipped) while carrying a heavy piece of equipment at a job site. The Workers’ Compensation Board denied compensability, concluding that claimant’s violation of his employer’s instructions placed his injury outside the course and scope of claimant’s employment. The Court of Appeals affirmed that decision, and claimant petitioned for review by this court. We allowed the petition to decide whether and when an employee’s failure to follow an employer’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc. v. Indian Head Cattle Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stark v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Clark v. U. S. PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Roberts v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hearthstone Manor v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Iliaifar v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API