Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case requires us to review a court of appeals decision affirming a Stearns County district court judgment in which the district court concluded that injuries sustained by respondent Sheryl Dougherty, an insured of appellant State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm), arose out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle and that Dougherty was therefore entitled to no-fault insurance benefits. Because we conclude that Dougherty’s injuries were a natural consequence of her use of a vehicle, we affirm.
Dougherty’s injuries occurred on December 17, 2000, when she…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Rymer Companies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. AshantiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. MarvinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.