Legal Opinion

Robinson v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1952No. Civ. 19021PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment directing a verdict in favor of defendants after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of defendants, plaintiff appeals. There is also a purported appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Fads: Plaintiff, a licensed plumber, was employed by defendants to install certain plumbing and do repair work in connection therewith on a hotel of defendants’ known as the Ohio Hotel. Specifically he was hired to install a boiler, heater and the regular pipe work in connection therewith.

The work was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Golceff v. SugarmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Newman v. Fox West Coast TheatresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Koppelman v. Ambassador Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Medcraft v. the Merchants ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merrill v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Woodman v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Mitchell v. A. J. Bayer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Cheyney v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Saeter v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API