Legal Opinion

Saeter v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1960No. Civ. 6288PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff through alleged negligent and faulty design of a motorcycle. Verdict and judgment went for plaintiff in the sum of $30,000, and defendant appeals.

Plaintiff’s complaint was originally in three counts, but the second and third counts were disposed of before submission to the jury, so that the cause went to the jury on only the first count alleging negligence in manufacturing according to a defective design as the proximate cause of the accident and injury complained of.

The facts as shown by the record before us are as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. City of Tucson v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Briggs v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Williams v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bookout v. Victor Comptometer Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API