Legal Opinion

Koppelman v. Ambassador Hotel Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1939No. Civ. 12310PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This action was for damages resulting from injuries suffered by plaintiff in a corridor of the Ambassador Hotel September 12, 1938. After the evidence was in, the defendants moved for an instructed verdict. The motion was granted and this appeal is from the judgment based thereon.

The plaintiff called at the hotel for the purpose of visiting defendant bank, a concessionaire of the hotel, in which she maintained an account and which she often visited. The bank had an entrance on the west side of the hotel building and a rear entrance opening from the north-south corridor which is entered…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API