Legal Opinion

Woodman v. Ackerman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1967No. 23703PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

249 Cal.App.2d 644 (1967)

57 Cal. Rptr. 687

ROY H. WOODMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

FREDERICK W. ACKERMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. 23703.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 22, 1967.

Philip A. Ray and Kelso, Cotton & Ernst for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Marion B. Plant, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Harold C. Faulkner, W. Burleigh Pattee, William L. Ferdon, Chickering & Gregory, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Noble K. Gregory, William I. Edlund, Walter R. Allan and Parker A. Maddux for Defendants and Respondents.

ELKINGTON, J.

This is an…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ferraro v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Morrissey v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Guenter v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API