Legal Opinion

Medcraft v. the Merchants Exchange

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13402PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries. At the conclusion of the evidence the court, on motion of defendant, granted a nonsuit and judgment followed from which plaintiff appeals upon a full record. The facts are not in dispute and those here material may be set forth within a narrow compass:

Defendant owns a large office building in the city and county of San Francisco known as The Merchants Exchange Building. Offices therein are rented .to tenants for their own use and the use of all persons having business with them. Plaintiff, an insurance manager, on December 13, 1919, had business with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Powers v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hamakawa v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Koppelman v. Ambassador Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Wentink v. TrapHagenNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Billeter v. Rhodes & Jamieson, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API