Golceff v. Sugarman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
In this action to recover damages for personal injuries the court, at the close of plaintiff’s case, granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals from the subsequently entered judgment. Upon consideration of the entire record, and of the authorities governing courts in passing on such motions, we are of the view that plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to require submission of the case to the jury, and that the judgment should be reversed.
A trial court must deny a motion for a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case “if there is . . . any substantial evidence, which, with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.