Legal Opinion

State v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1981No. 10-80-07971, CA 19337PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*632WARREN, J.

Defendant was indicted for sodomy in the first degree and coercion in compelling another person to engage in deviate sexual intercourse. Defendant demurred to the second count of the indictment (coercion) on the ground that the indictment and the statute were unconstitutionally vague. In written memoranda the additional contention was made that the statute was unconstitutionally broad. The trial judge signed an order which sustained the demurrer, and the state appeals from that order.1 We reverse and remand for trial.

The second count of the indictment is as follows:

"And as part of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  2. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SteigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. PaigeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API