Legal Opinion

State v. Steiger

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 21, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 88-657PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal involves the criminal prosecution and conviction of Sam Steiger, a member of the staff of the former Governor of the State of Arizona, Evan Mecham. Steiger was charged with a criminal violation of A.R.S. § 13-1804, which is entitled “Theft by Extortion.” The information specifically charged Steiger with violating A.R.S. § 13-1804(A)(8), which provides:

(A) A person commits theft by extortion by knowingly ... seeking to obtain property or services by means of a threat to do in the future any one of the following:(8) Perform or cause to be performed…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. TakacsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API