Legal Opinion

State v. Paige

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1982No. 10-80-07972, CA A20052PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*521ROBERTS, J.

This is an appeal by the state from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to a charge of coercion. Our decision is controlled by the decision in State v. Robertson, 54 Or App 630, 635 P2d 1057 (1981), the defendant in this case having been indicted along with the defendant in Robertson for the crimes of first degree sodomy and coercion arising from the same single incident.

The opinion in Robertson made clear that the basis of its holding that the coercion statute, ORS 163.275, is constitutional was its finding that it is not a statute regulating speech. It is this position with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. Bruce Lincoln ButterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. PaigeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API