Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 12, 1929No. Docket No. 3574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an action to recover personal property, consisting of automobile tires and tubes, in which action the plaintiff claims the delivery of the property and it ivas given into his possession prior to the trial. The ease was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant for the return of the property and fixed its value at $30,000. Judgment was entered accordingly and the plaintiff has appealed. The plaintiff is the assignee and agent of the Falls Rubber Company, which will be referred to herein as the company.

By the terms of a consignment agreement between the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Conolley v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Griffith v. ReddickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Wilkerson v. ThorpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Cline v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Rathbun v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Cline v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API