Legal Opinion
Cline v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 12, 1929No. Docket No. 3575PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is one of the actions arising out of the contract and transactions set forth in Campbell v. Smith (No. 3574), ante, p. 689 [274 Pac. 758], to which reference is hereby made for a more complete statement of facts. The plaintiff in this action is the assignee and agent of the Falls Rubber Company.
The complaint is in three counts, on three trade acceptances executed by defendant in favor of the Falls Rubber Company. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of these trade acceptances and judgment was entered accordingly. The defendant has not appealed from the judgment and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. C. T. Patterson & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Campbell v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Martin v. U-Haul Co. of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Santa Clara Properties Co. v. R. L. C., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Black v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Citri-Lite Co. v. Cott Beverages, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.