Wilkerson v. Thorp
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Graves, O’Melveny & Shankland, and Carroll H. Allen, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The facts of this case are substantially as follows: On November 30, 1896, the plaintiff made a written lease to defendant Thorp of certain real estate in Los Angeles county for the term of one year from the date thereof, for the rental of eight hundred and fifty dollars, one-half to be paid on or before the first day of August, and the remainder on or before the thirtieth day of October, 1897. The lease was not acknowledged nor recorded. In addition to the usual covenants it contained the following clause:
“And the said party of the second part also further agrees that as soon as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Treadwell v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Arques v. WassonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Lemon v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hall v. GlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Vassault v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Valley National Bank of Ariz. v. Avco Develop. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Barthelmess v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Zeller v. MilliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Griffith v. ReddickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.