Larson v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioners seek Supreme Court review and, thereby, our reconsideration of our opinion holding that their state and federal constitutional taking claims are not ripe for adjudication, and rejecting their argument that they come within the “futility exception” to the ripeness requirement. We allow reconsideration, clarify our opinion and adhere to it as clarified.
The matters that we reconsider are narrow, and we do not restate the facts or the reasoning in our earlier opinion except as they relate directly to the points that we address. Petitioners quote, with apparent disapproval, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Joyce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Larson v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Curran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- Murray v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005