Legal Opinion

State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 21, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 325, 2 CA-CIV 344PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This court has granted oral argument on the motion for rehearing to consider new matter presented by the respondents in a motion for rehearing. The new matter brought to the attention of the court is the assertion that the respondent-judge was the designated “Assignment Judge” in Pima County at the time of the entry of the order directing that the subject grand jury be called into session and discharged and that, as such, he was vested with jurisdiction to so order under Criminal Rule 97(B), 17 A.R.S.

The position of “Assignment Judge” is established by Rule V of the Local Rules…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re A. & H. Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Philadelphia County Grand Jury Investigation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Special Grand Jury CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Midkiff v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. State v. NorgardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. State v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Woodahl v. District Court of the First Judicial District ex rel. County of Lewis & ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Arpaio v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API