Legal Opinion

State v. Norgard

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 5, 1967No. 2 CA-CR 86PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This appeal presents questions relative to proof of prior conviction under our statute providing for increased punishment in the case of convicted defendants who are charged and found guilty of having been previously convicted of certain criminal offenses. A.R.S. § 13-1649.

The defendant in this case was convicted by a jury of the crime of attempted burglary. After the jury had brought in a verdict of guilty on the principal charge, the trial was reconvened in pursuance of Rule 291, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., to determine whether the defendant had been previously…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BeardenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. SingletonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. The People v. CaseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Newman v. PiazzaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. State v. FortesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. State v. ReasonerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API