Legal Opinion
Bade v. Drachman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 13, 1966No. 2 CA-CIV 260PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
This appeal is taken from a judgment in the Superior Court of Pima County in favor of appellees (plaintiffs below) against ap*58pellants (defendants below). We shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the lower court. The factual posture of the case, as to which there is no dispute, is as follows.
Plaintiffs Drachman are the owners of commercial real property and the improvements thereon and plaintiff Campbell Plaza Co. is the lessee of this property. The improvements consist of a shopping center, constructed in 1960. In 1963, the Pima County Assessor assessed for tax purposes…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Rowland v. City of TylerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Allen v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Frank v. Assessors of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Keniston v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.