Legal Opinion

In Re Ford Motor Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1998No. 97-0430PublishedCited by 244 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbbott, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT and OWEN, Justices, join.

In this mandamus proceeding, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion by imposing discovery sanctions against Ford Motor Company. As part of the sanction order, the trial court excluded evidence Ford obtained from a nonparty and ordered Ford to pay plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees for both the trial court and appellate proceedings. We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by determining that Ford’s conduct was sanctionable and by awarding attorney’s fees. However', because we conclude that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. MayfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by244 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re KuntzTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Le, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. In Re Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API