Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Mayfield

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1996No. 95-1209PublishedCited by 308 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Chief Justice

in which GONZALEZ, HECHT, ENOCH, OWEN, and ABBOTT, Justices, joined.

In the workers’ compensation suit underlying this original mandamus proceeding, the trial court appointed an attorney to represent the claimant, ordering the carrier to pay opposing counsel’s fees as the case progressed. While not challenging the appointment itself, the carrier contends that the trial court abused its discretion and caused irreparable harm by requiring it to pay for the claimant’s attorney. Because we agree, we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

I

Real party in interest Aliene Reed, a 49 year-old office…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by308 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hyundai Motor Co. v. Rodriguez Ex Rel. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re AIU Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004

303 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API