In Re Kuntz
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith
in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice JEFFERSON, Justice SCHNEIDER, Justice WAINWRIGHT, and Justice BRISTER joined.
In this mandamus proceeding, we decide a question of first impression regarding the proper interpretation and application under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure of the phrase “possession, custody, or control.” See TEX.R. CIV. P. 192.3(b), 192.7(b). The respondent trial court, in an action filed against relator Hal Kuntz in his individual capacity, ordered Kuntz to produce documents that he had access to at his place of employment. It was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- GTE Communications Systems Corp. v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Colonial Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- IBP, Inc. v. Klumpe, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. DuenezTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., LPTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Gonzalez v. Reliant Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Living Centers of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Rivenes v. Holden, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.