Legal Opinion

Braden v. Downey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1991No. C-9438PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

Respondent District Judge, Hon. Daniel M. Downey, ordered relator Don T. Braden to answer certain discovery requests and found that his earlier refusal to do so was abusive of the discovery process. As sanctions for such abuse, the district court ordered Braden to pay $10,000 to the party seeking discovery, and ordered Braden’s attorney to perform ten hours’ community service. The deadlines ordered for payment of the monetary sanctions and completion of the community service preceded conclusion of the litigation. 1 Braden seeks mandamus directing the district court to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Street v. Second Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. GTE Communications Systems Corp. v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In re GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2018

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API