Legal Opinion

In Re Monsanto Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided August 31, 1999No. 10-99-137-CVPublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

Relators, Monsanto Company and other entities, seek a writ of mandamus requiring Respondent, the Honorable Robert Stem, Judge of the 82nd District Court of Falls County, to vacate an order by which he denied their claims of privilege as to almost 400 documents. The Real Parties in Interest (Plaintiffs) are farmers and farming entities who planted Relators’ genetically-engineered cotton seed during the 1996 growing season. They seek damages for spraying costs and lost yields, alleging that Relators made false claims concerning the insect-resistant nature of the product.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Humphreys v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Monsanto Co. v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  4. In Re Conseco Finance Servicing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. In Re: Avantel, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API