Legal Opinion

Rivercenter Associates v. Rivera

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1993No. D-3172PublishedCited by 299 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPECTOR, Justice.

Rivercenter Associates seeks mandamus relief from a trial court order overruling its motion to quash the jury demand by Real Party in Interest All Ashore, Inc. Because we hold that Rivercenter delayed without explanation its filing of the motion to quash and therefore is not entitled to mandamus relief, the petition is denied.

The underlying cause of action is a suit for enforcement of commercial lease and surety agreements. Rivercenter brought suit against Real Parties in Interest All Ashore, Inc. and its surety Les Robbins to recover rental payments after All Ashore’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Callahan v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bailey v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by299 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. LpTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re International Profit Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Laibe Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2010

294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API