Legal Opinion

Boyd v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 1, 1886No. 983PublishedCited by 3,670 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was an information against thirty-five cases of polished plate glass. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the court. Judgment in favor of the United States. The claimants sued out this writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

This was an information filed by the District Attorney, of the United States in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, in July, 1884, in a cause of seizure and’forfeiture of property, against thirty-five cases of plate glass, seized by the collector as forfeited to the United States, under.§ 12 of the “ Act to amend the customs revenue laws, and to repeal moieties,” passed June 22, 1874; 18 Stat. 186.

It is declared by that section that any owner, importer, con-signee, &c., who shall, with intent to defraud the revenue, make, or attempt to make, any entry of imported…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Three Tons of CoalDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1875
  2. United States v. MasonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1875
  3. United States v. Distillery No. Twenty-EightDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1875
  4. In re PlattDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1874
  5. United States v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1875

3Cited by3,670 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

3,665 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API