Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Eggum

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1938No. 7,840PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This action seeks relief in the nature of specific performance of a contract between plaintiff and Mary J. Williamson, whereby the latter was alleged to have agreed not to change a will she had made and' delivered to plaintiff, in which she devised and bequeathed her property to him in consideration for services to be rendered by him in caring for her during her lifetime. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendants have appealed from the judgment.

The evidence in many respects was conflicting. The court in the main adopted…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Pincus v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Roy v. King's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sharp v. SharpMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gaspar v. BuckinghamMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hooker v. HoskynsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Conitz Ex Rel. Hafferman v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API