Steinberger v. Young
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County settling the final account of an-administrator of the estate of a deceased person. James C. Bives, Judge. Beversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. H. Merriam, G. Harold Janeway, and Hunsaker, Britt & Edwards, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
SLOSS. J.
This is an appeal from parts of an order settling the final account of the administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Ross, deceased. The appellant, Maggie G. Steinberger, claimed the entire estate under an oral agreement with the decedent, and had succeeded in establishing her asserted right in an action brought by her against the administrator and others. The judgment there given in her favor was affirmed by this court in May, 1917. (Steinberger v. Young, 175 Cal. 81, [165 Pac. 432].) The character of this litigation bears directly on the present appeal, but we need not elaborate it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Thomas v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Jones v. LamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bates v. RybergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Williams v. BabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Murphey v. American Jewish CongressCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of KesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.