Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Hoskyns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1958No. 37430PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa County, upon trial de novo affirming a judgment of the county court of that county awarding fees to the special administrators of the estate ■of Flora B. Barton, deceased, as well as fees to the attorneys for such special administrators, and refusing to surcharge the special administrators with the interest allowed to accrue by the failure to pay federal and state estate taxes when due. Tono L. Hooker, administrator of the estate of Flora B. Barton, deceased, and Tono L. Hooker and J. D. Hooker, individually,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re Baxter's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re Connolly's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Griffith's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Barton v. HookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Nichols v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. First National Bank of Wichita Falls in Wichita Falls v. StricklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Tapp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Thompson v. GammonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Matter of Estate of KatschorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API