Legal Opinion

Gaspar v. Buckingham

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1944No. 8493PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable DAVID N. NYQUIST,

District Judge, sitting in place of Mr. Justice ADAIR, disqualified, delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal by Walter E. Buckingham, as administrator of the Estate of William Gaspar, deceased, from an adverse judgment in an action instituted by Teador Gaspar, the general purpose of which action, as set forth in the complaint, is to establish the claim of the said Teador Gaspar that he and his brother, William Gaspar, were partners in the livestock and ranching business, which was conducted by William Gaspar up to the time of his death; and that by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Mares v. MaresMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Popejoy v. BoyntonOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Silver v. EakinsMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Simons v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nichols v. KnowlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Tripp v. ChubbArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re McAnelly's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Matter of Estate of SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. GriesingerMontana Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API