Re Faling Estate
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The Circuit Court, probate department, allowed handsome fees to the defenders of the will declared by this court to be invalid, but, on jurisdictional grounds denied the petition for attorneys’ fees of the attorneys of the legatees, who successfully contested the fraudulent will and successfully propounded the valid will of testatrix.
The County Court has the exclusive jurisdiction, in the first instance, to take proof of wills, to grant and revoke letters testamentary of administration, and to direct and control the conduct and settlement of the accounts of executors and administrators. The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- McIntire v. McIntireSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Kirsher v. KirsherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mosells Silvey Pitner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Becht v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re Wilmott's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- SISTERS OF CHARITY OF PROV. OF MONT. v. NicholsMontana Supreme Court · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClintonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.