Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Hladky Construction, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2002No. 01-131PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] While Appellant Van Ewing (Ewing) was employed by Appellee Hladky Construc tion, Inc., (company), he received one thousand shares of stock in the company from Appellee Mike Hladky (Hladky). Upon Ewing's resignation, Hladky demanded the return of the stock, and Ewing refused, insisting he was entitled to compensation for the return of the stock. Litigation ensued, and, after a bench trial, the trial court determined that the stock was a conditional gift with a reversionary interest and must be returned without compensation. In his appeal, Ewing contends that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Howell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Sowerwine v. NielsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Grossman v. GreensteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Comet Energy Services, LLC v. Powder River Oil & Gas Ventures LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Linton v. E.C. Cates Agency, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Seherr-Thoss v. Seherr-ThossWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API