Sowerwine v. Nielson

CARDINE, Justice.

This action involved a dispute over the correct location of the common boundary between Tract 54, owned by appellee (Niel-son), and Tract 56, owned by appellant (Sowerwine). Appellee (Schmalz) was Neil-son’s lessee and sought damages. This appeal is from the judgment establishing the boundary as claimed by Nielson.

We will affirm.

Appellant, in his brief, states the issues as follows:

1. “Is the controlling boundary between the Sowerwine land and the Nielson land w7here the Plaintiffs [appellees] say it is or where the Defendant [appellant] says it is?”

2. “Were the Plaintiffs…