Legal Opinion

Linton v. E.C. Cates Agency, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2005No. 04-163PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ernest M. Linton and Carole J. Linton (Lintons) appeal the district court’s ruling granting summary judgment to E.C. Cates Agency, Inc. (Cates). They contend the district court erred in finding that a Lease Option to Purchase agreement entered into between the parties was unenforceable. We reverse.

[¶ 2] The parties present numerous issues. Upon our review, we find that the dispositive issue is:

Did the district court err when it found that no genuine issues of material fact existed and granted Cates’ motion for summary judgment?

FACTS

[¶ 3] In October, 1995, the parties…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Crockett v. LowtherWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fowler v. FowlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bonk v. BoyajianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cook v. Shoshone First BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hunter v. ReeceWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Kruckenberg v. Ding Masters, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wyoming Board of Land Commissioners v. Antelope Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API