Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Ogorzalek

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 31, 1977PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

The defendant made a motion for summary judgment which was allowed by a judge of the Superior Court based on the pleadings, interrogatories, and affidavits filed by the parties. The judge ruled that G. L. c. 260, § 9, 1 which provides for the suspension or “tolling” of the statute of limitations for the period during which a defendant resides out of the Commonwealth, is not applicable when a nonresident defendant could be served pursuant to G. L. c. 90, § 3A, 2 and, therefore, that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. Judgment was entered for the defendant, and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Couts v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Coombs v. DarlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Byrne v. OgleAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Reed, Admr. v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Marshall Garber v. Heriberto Menendez, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Meyer v. PaschalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Woodcock v. American Investment Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Gordon & Co. v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API