Walsh v. Ogorzalek
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
The defendant made a motion for summary judgment which was allowed by a judge of the Superior Court based on the pleadings, interrogatories, and affidavits filed by the parties. The judge ruled that G. L. c. 260, § 9, 1 which provides for the suspension or “tolling” of the statute of limitations for the period during which a defendant resides out of the Commonwealth, is not applicable when a nonresident defendant could be served pursuant to G. L. c. 90, § 3A, 2 and, therefore, that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. Judgment was entered for the defendant, and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Couts v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Coombs v. DarlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Byrne v. OgleAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Reed, Admr. v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wilcox v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Marshall Garber v. Heriberto Menendez, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Meyer v. PaschalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Woodcock v. American Investment Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Gordon & Co. v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.