Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Ogle

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1971No. 1359PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BONEY, Chief Justice.

The facts in this case have been stipulated ; a single issue is presented.

The appellant, William Byrne, was the plaintiff below. He seeks reversal of a superior court judgment dismissing his action for personal injuries as barred by Alaska’s two-year statute of limitations, AS 09.10.-070. 1

The essential facts are few. The action arises from an auto accident in Anchorage involving the appellant and the appellee, Joe E. Ogle. The accident occurred on February 2, 1968; appellant’s action was not filed until May 21, 1970, more than two years after the date of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Couts v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Coombs v. DarlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Snyder v. CluneUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Reed, Admr. v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  5. Hurwitch v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, Lp, Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Research Systems Corporation v. Ipsos Publicite, Ipsos Usa, IpsosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API