Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 1, 1987PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
We granted further appellate review to consider the interpretation to be given to G. L. c. 260, § 9, 2 including its last clause, the so-called “borrowing clause.” See Wilcox v. Riverside Park Enters., Inc., 21 Mass. App. Ct. 419 (1986). This provision is so named because, in some circumstances, the clause requires application of the statute of limitations of another jurisdiction.
The plaintiffs, Connecticut residents, brought an action in Massachusetts, arising out of an accident which occurred in Massachusetts, against a Massachusetts defendant which at all relevant times has been subject to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Town Crier, Inc. v. Chief of Police of WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cosme v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Knapp Shoes, Inc. v. Sylvania Shoe Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Gourdeau Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Foss v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Biogen IDEC MA, Inc. v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.