Legal Opinion
Coombs v. Darling
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The appellant was operating her automobile easterly on the public highway in Greenwich on November 3d, 1930, while a truck of the defendant Briar Hills Nursery, Inc., was being operated westerly on the same highway, and directly behind the truck the defendant Jane Darling was operating her automobile. The last-named defendant in attempting to pass the truck, turned to the left and collided with the plaintiff’s car, causing a damage to the latter which the trial court fixed at $1000. The court held the Briar Hills .Nursery, Inc., free from blame, and that the damage was caused solely by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Sage v. HawleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- Appeal of New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Board of Tax Review of FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.