Raytheon Constructors v. Tobola
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
The Workers’ Compensation Board (board), applying the last injurious exposure rule, found that claimant Tobola’s bilateral hearing loss was a compensable occupational disease and that employer Raytheon Constructors and its insurer, Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, 1 were responsible for claimant’s condition. Raytheon seeks judicial review, contending that claimant’s visit to an audiologist and the audiologist’s recommendation for hearing aids did not constitute “medical services” under ORS 656.802(l)(a), that claimant’s hearing loss was therefore not a compensable occupational disease…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Gormley v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- SAIF Corp. v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Spurlock v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- AIG Claim Services v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. GillilandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005