Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. International Paper Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. WCB 85-03381; CA A43109PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that reversed a referee’s order awarding her scheduled permanent partial disability and holding that International Paper Company (IP), a self-insured employer, is responsible for payment. We review de novo and reverse.

Claimant worked for IP from 1966 to 1981 as a dryer feeder. In 1977, she experienced bilateral hand and forearm numbness. Doctor Stainsby diagnosed a carpal tunnel syndrome. She filed a claim with IP, which was accepted as non-disabling. She was laid off by IP in 1981. Later, she was employed by Georgia Pacific (GP) as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Runft v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Willamette Industries, Inc. v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Raytheon Constructors v. TobolaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. SAIF Corp. v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Stevens Equipment Co. v. American FabricatorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API