SAIF Corp. v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
The Workers’ Compensation Board, applying the last injurious exposure rule, assigned responsibility for claimant’s occupational hearing loss to Gilkison & Dad, Inc. (Gilkison), and its insurer, SAIF. They seek judicial review. Because we conclude that claimant first sought and received medical care when he took an audiogram and obtained a hearing aid and that those events occurred before he was hired by Gilkison, we reverse and remand.
Claimant worked at several jobs for different employers in the logging industry between 1960 and his retirement in 1997 at the age of 60. Each of his jobs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Runft v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Cook v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Agricomp Insurance v. TappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brodak v. ViscontiColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- AIG Claim Services v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007