Legal Opinion

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Gilliland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 2005No. 02-07278, 02-03568; A123111PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

At issue in this workers’ compensation case is which of two employers is responsible for claimant’s compensable carpal tunnel syndrome. The Workers’ Compensation Board (board) concluded that Holley Moulding (Holley) is responsible because claimant first sought medical treatment while working for that employer. Holley seeks review, arguing that Murphy Plywood (Murphy), claimant’s earlier employer, is responsible because claimant actually sought medical treatment while working there, notwithstanding the board’s finding to the contrary. We affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. In 2001,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Timm v. MaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. LuhrsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Agricomp Insurance v. TappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AIG Claim Services v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API